ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Structural network communication differences in drug-naive depressed adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural Circuit Taxonomy and Precision Psychiatry in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicide attempts (SA) often co-occur during adolescence and are associated with long-term adverse health outcomes. Unfortunately, neural mechanisms underlying self-injury and SA are poorly understood in depressed adolescents but likely relate to the structural abnormalities in brain regions.
aimTo investigate structural network communication within large-scale brain networks in adolescents with depression.
methodsWe constructed five distinct network communication models to evaluate structural network efficiency at the whole-brain level in adolescents with depression. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired from 32 healthy controls and 85 depressed adolescents, including 17 depressed adolescents without SA or NSSI (major depressive disorder group), 27 depressed adolescents with NSSI but no SA (NSSI group), and 41 depressed adolescents with SA and NSSI (NSSI + SA group).
resultsSignificant differences in structural network communication were observed across the four groups, involving spatially widespread brain regions, particularly encompassing cortico-cortical connections (
conclusionThis study provides evidence of structural network communication differences in depressed adolescents with NSSI and SA, highlighting impaired neuroanatomical communication efficiency as a potential contributor to their symptoms. These findings offer new insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the comorbidity of NSSI and SA in adolescent depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.