ArticleDermatology reports2026
Anamnestic, clinical, and dermoscopic predictors of malignancy in melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules: a retrospective study.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules (MLPGs) usually represent lesions in an active growth phase and should be carefully evaluated in adults and the elderly, since melanoma can rarely present with this pattern. The primary aim of this study was to identify anamnestic, clinical, and dermoscopic features associated with malignancy (histologic outcome of melanoma) in MLPGs. The secondary aim was to describe the frequency of these features. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional observational study, evaluating anamnestic, clinical, and dermoscopic features of MLPGs excised at the Dermatology Clinic of Trieste, Italy (January 2019-June 2023). The association between each variable and the histologic outcome (nevus or melanoma) was assessed using Fisher's exact test. Differences in age and lesion diameter distribution between nevi and melanomas were analyzed using Student's t-test for independent variables. Several lesion characteristics were associated with malignancy, including a personal history of melanoma (p=0.0069), localization on the lower limbs (p=0.0215), and lesion diameter ≥6 mm (p=0.0025). Several dermoscopic features were also associated with malignancy, namely non-circumferential peripheral globules (PGs; p=0.0406), regression (p=0.0042), evident vascular pattern/pink areas (p=0.0007), inverse network (p=0.0243), and asymmetric central globules (p=0.0057). Additionally, the comparison between melanoma and nevi groups confirmed that malignant lesions were characterized by a higher mean age at diagnosis (p=0.0237) and a larger mean diameter (p=0.000112). This study provides practical guidance for the management of MLPGs, highlighting that several anamnestic, clinical, and dermoscopic features are suggestive of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.