Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495649›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

Natural Design of a Stabilized Cross-β Fold: Structure of the FuA FapC from Pseudomonas Sp. UK4 Reveals a Critical Role for Stacking of Imperfect Repeats.

Yanting Jiang, Samuel Peña-Díaz, Zhefei Zhang, Anders Ogechi Hostrup Daugberg, Marcos López Hernández, Janni Nielsen, Qiaojie Huang, Shenghan Qin, Morten K D Dueholm, Mingdong Dong and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A functional amyloid scaffold shapes insect egg coats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. The Importance of Being Imperfect: Structure and Function of Bacterial Amyloid.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yanting JiangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Medicine of Guangxi Department of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Shuangyong Road 6, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.
Samuel Peña-DíazInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Zhefei ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Medicine of Guangxi Department of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Shuangyong Road 6, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.
Anders Ogechi Hostrup DaugbergDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, Aalborg OE, 9220, Denmark.
Marcos López HernándezInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-7374
Janni NielsenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Qiaojie HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Medicine of Guangxi Department of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Shuangyong Road 6, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.
Shenghan QinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Medicine of Guangxi Department of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Shuangyong Road 6, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.
Morten K D DueholmDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, Aalborg OE, 9220, Denmark.
Mingdong DongInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Jan Skov PedersenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-0206
Qin CaoBio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Daniel E OtzenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-8989
Huabing WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Medicine of Guangxi Department of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Shuangyong Road 6, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530021, China.

Funding

Danish Independent Research Foundation 3103-00285BLundbeck Foundation R276-2018-671Lundbeck Foundation R453-2024-359National Natural Science Foundation of China 32460228Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF22OC007891Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation 2023GXNSFAA026030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An essential structural component of bacterial biofilms is functional amyloid (FuA), which also has great potential as an engineerable nano-biomaterial. However, experimentally based high resolution structures of FuA that resolve individual residues are lacking. A fully experimentally based 3.2 Å resolution cryo-electron microscopy density map of the FuA protein FapC from Pseudomonas sp. UK4 is presented, which reveals a Greek key-shaped protofilament. The structure supports bioinformatic identification of conserved motifs and is broadly consistent with the AlphaFold prediction but with important modifications. Each FapC monomer consists of three imperfect repeats (IRs), with each repeat forming one cross-β layer. An array of highly conserved Asn and Gln residues with an extensive H-bonding network underpins this conserved Greek key-shape and reveals the role of heterogeneous cross-β stacking in amyloid cross-seeding. The covariation of residues in the hydrophobic core among different IRs suggests a cooperative monomer folding process during fibril elongation, while heterogeneous stacking of IRs reduces charge repulsion between layers to stabilize the monomer fold. The FapC fibrils show intrinsic catalytic activity and strain-dependent nanomechanical properties. Combined with mutagenesis data, the structure provides mechanistic insights into formation of FapC FuA from disordered monomers and a structural foundation for the design of novel biomaterials.

Indexed as

AmyloidBacterial ProteinsPseudomonasAmino Acid SequenceCryoelectron MicroscopyModels, MolecularProtein FoldingRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidAmyloidBacterial Proteinscross‐seedingFuAGreek key motifsequence motifssite‐directed mutagenesisstable protein self‐assembly

Identifiers

PMID40495649
PMCPMC12392863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.