ArticleRecent advances in drug delivery and formulation2025
QbD-driven Formulation Development and Evaluation of Genistein Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer.
Article in Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoformulated Phytochemicals Against Pancreatic Cancer: Emerging Advances in Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenistein (GEN) shows significant anticancer potential, particularly against prostate cancer. However, its clinical application is limited by poor water solubility, rapid metabolism and excretion, low bioavailability, and lack of targeted delivery to cancer cells, hindering its effectiveness as a chemopreventive or therapeutic agent.
objectiveIn this study, poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanoparticles incorporating polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as a stabilizer were engineered to encapsulate genistein (GEN) effectively. Utilizing a Quality by Design (QbD) methodology, the development and optimization of these nanoparticles were systematically approached.
methodsGEN-loaded PCL nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared using the Solvent Evaporation Technique, ideal for encapsulating hydrophobic drugs. A Plackett-Burman design (PBD) identified key factors, followed by a Box-Behnken design (BBD) to optimize nanoparticle quality. The NPs were evaluated for particle size, zeta potential (ZP), polydispersity index (PDI), morphology, encapsulation efficiency (EE), in vitro drug release, and cytotoxicity.
resultsThe optimized formulation containing PCL, PVA, and Volume of organic solvent as 43.7 mg, 6.2 mg, and 10.0 ml, respectively was chosen because it showed EE (%) of 94.0%, average particle size of 150 nm, PDI of 0.10, ZP of -28.0 and exhibited sustained release of GEN for around four days. The antiproliferative activities of GEN PCL NPs were confirmed by the MTT test
conclusionThe findings indicate that genistein-loaded PCL nanoparticles have the potential to augment the anticancer efficacy of genistein, both
Indexed as
Identifiers
40495599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.