ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025
Predictive efficacy of rectus abdominis muscle and psoas major muscle thickness for postoperative morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The association between skeletal muscle mass and postoperative morbidity in cancer patients has been demonstrated, but the results are not conclusive. The study aims to determine the predictive efficacy of rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) and psoas major muscle (PMM) thickness and other factors such as age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operation duration, obesity, preoperative inflammatory markers, and pathological findings for postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy + retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy + omentectomy for endometrial cancer were assessed retrospectively. Standard procedures (antibiotic prophylaxis and thromboembolism prophylaxis) were applied pre- and postoperatively, and the thicknesses of the RAM and PMM were measured by computed tomography. Postoperative morbidity was defined in the 3-month postoperative period as patients treated with a diagnosis of postoperative infection, those who developed pulmonary complications, thromboembolic complications, lymphatic drainage disorders, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Results: The mean thickness of the right-left RAM in the morbidity group was 7.4±2.1 mm, and 8.2±2.1 mm in the group without morbidity (p=0.038). On the other hand, the thickness of the right-left PMM was similar in both groups. When the predictive cut-off value for RAM thickness was 7.52 mm, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were 54.2%, 65.6%, 73.5%, and 44.8%, respectively. Advanced age, high ASA score, and extended operation duration were associated with an increased risk of morbidity in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only age and operation duration were independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity [respectively, odds ratio (OR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.12, p=0.033 and OR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.0003-1.007, p=0.039]. Conclusion: Age and operation duration were identified as independent risk factors for predicting postoperative morbidity. However, it has been shown that a more comprehensive evaluation, including RAM thickness and ASA score alongside these two factors, could provide more definitive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.