ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025
The effect of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines on vulvar condylomata.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current evidence concerning the possible clinical effects of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines on vulvar lesions is limited. The aim was to describe the effect of vaccines against COVID-19 on the progression of vulvar condylomas. Material and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with condylomata acuminate and treated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) between January 2021 and January 2023 in the gynecological oncology surgery clinic were evaluated. The patients were divided into groups based on their vaccination status; vaccinated or unvaccinated. The number/area of condylomas and symptom degrees of the patients before and after TCA treatment were compared. Results: A total of 202 patients, 102 vaccinated and 100 unvaccinated, were included. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, parity, smoking, oral contraceptive use, amount of condyloma and symptom degree (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the amount of condyloma between the groups after six months [p=0.589, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.238-1.566]. Moreover, there was no difference in the degree of symptoms after six months between the groups (p=0.467, 95% CI=1.113-1.799). Conclusion: The systemic effects caused by COVID-19 vaccines are still not fully understood. Considering that this vaccine, like many vaccines, elicits a strong immunogenic reaction, the possible clinical impact of this non-specific systemic inflammatory response on vulvar condyloma is a matter of curiosity. This study showed there was no difference in the amount of condyloma and the degree of symptoms six months after TCA treatment in the unvaccinated and vaccinated group. The low number of patients is the biggest limitation of this study. Larger studies may provide more robust information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.