ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025
Evaluation of the efficacy of mini-sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through patient-reported outcomes and transperineal ultrasonography.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Surgical Evaluation in Stress Urinary Incontinence by Transperineal Ultrasound and Quality of Life Questionnaire-A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Midurethral Sling Surgery: Impacts on Sexual Function and Approaches to Complications.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Changes in Sexual Function and Quality of Life After TVT Surgery in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Cohort Study.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Single-incision slings, such as Contasure-Needleless® (C-NDL), were developed to improve surgical treatment success in stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, more evidence is needed to describe the outcomes of mini-sling procedures as an alternative to classical mid-urethral slings. The aim was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of the mini-sling procedure using C-NDL in the surgical treatment of SUI patients. Material and Methods: This was a single-center, prospective study including 24 patients with SUI who underwent C-NDL. Michigan Incontinence Severity Index (M-ISI) questionnaire, the Female Sexual Function Index, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire were applied, as well as trans-perineal ultrasound evaluations at baseline, one month and six months postoperatively. Results: The PGI-I index showed that 54.17% of participants described their post-operative recovery as "very much better" and 29.17% as "much better". Significant improvements were observed in all SUI and M-ISI-related results. No significant differences were detected in terms of FSFI. Complications were reported as Conclusion: For SUI treatment, the C-NDL procedure is a safe and effective method with few complications and high subjective cure rates on short-term follow-up (6 months).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.