ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Segmentation of Leukoaraiosis on Noncontrast Head CT Using CT-MRI Paired Data Without Human Annotation.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEvaluating leukoaraiosis (LA) on CT is challenging due to its low contrast and similarity to parenchymal gliosis. We developed and validated a deep learning algorithm for LA segmentation using CT-MRIFLAIR paired data from a multicenter Korean registry and tested it in a US dataset.
methodsWe constructed a large multicenter dataset of CT-FLAIR MRI pairs. Using validated software to segment white matter hyperintensity (WMH) on FLAIR, we generated pseudo-ground-truth LA labels on CT through deformable image registration. A 2D nnU-Net architecture was trained solely on CT images and registered masks. Performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Pearson correlation across internal, external, and US validation cohorts. Clinical associations of predicted LA volume with age, risk factors, and poststroke outcomes were also analyzed.
resultsThe external test set yielded a DSC of 0.527, with high volume correlations against registered LA (r = 0.953) and WMH (r = 0.951). In the external testing and US datasets, predicted LA volumes correlated with Fazekas grade (r = 0.832-0.891) and the correlations were consistent across CT vendors and infarct volumes. In an independent clinical cohort (n = 867), LA volume was independently associated with age, vascular risk factors, and 3-month functional outcomes.
interpretationOur deep learning algorithm offers a reproducible method for LA segmentation on CT, bridging the gap between CT and MRI assessments in patients with ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.