ReviewAnnals of African medicine2026
Diversity in Clinical Characteristics and Composition of Urinary Stones in Different Regions of India and Comparison to Rest of the World.
Review in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractUrinary stones are a common urological condition that exhibits significant variability in prevalence, clinical presentation, and composition across different geographic regions. In India, the condition affects approximately 2 million individuals annually, with notable regional differences driven by dietary habits, environmental factors, and socioeconomic conditions. This study comprehensively reviews the clinical characteristics, urinary stone composition, and associated risk factors in India while comparing these findings with global trends. The data for this review were obtained through an extensive analysis of the available literature on urinary stone composition and clinical characteristics in India and various countries worldwide. Sources included multiple databases such as Springer, Scopus, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Wiley, Web of Science, PubMed, and Taylor and Francis. The data were synthesized to assess the prevalence, composition, and risk factors of urinary stones by region, and these were compared with international data. Mixed stones were more commonly observed in northern and coastal regions, while uric acid (UA) stones showed a higher prevalence in the southern states. Globally, calcium oxalate (CaOx) remained the dominant stone type, but certain regions exhibited a higher occurrence of struvite and UA stones, largely attributed to specific dietary patterns and infection rates. The study concludes that urinary stone composition in India varies regionally due to dietary habits, hydration, and environmental factors. While CaOx remains prevalent globally, other stone types show distinct regional differences. Targeted prevention through hydration and dietary modifications is crucial, and future research should explore genetic predispositions and the impact of climate change on stone formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.