Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495411›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025

Euro-Chinese consensus on accessory cavitated uterine malformation

Lan Zhu, Zichen Zhao, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Maribel Acién, Joel Naftalin, Thierry Van den Bosch, Charleen Sze-Yan Cheung, Dabao Xu, Xiaowu Huang, Grigoris Grimbizis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecological Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-5426
Zichen ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecological Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8400-4484
Attilio Di Spiezio SardoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, ItalyORCID 0000-0001-6485-5735
Maribel AciénDepartment of Gynecology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, San Juan Campus, Alicante, Spain.
Joel NaftalinUniversity College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-1291
Thierry Van den BoschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-5036
Charleen Sze-Yan CheungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2882-6595
Dabao XuDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0009-0006-5486-763X
Xiaowu HuangDepartment of Hysteroscopic Centre, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Grigoris Grimbizis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Papageorgiou" Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6230-4638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accessory cavitated uterine malformations (ACUMs) are a rare obstructive uterine anomaly that remains poorly understood, posing challenges for clinical management. The aetiopathogenesis is hypothesised to involve the duplication and persistence of ductal Müllerian tissue usually near the round ligament attachment, potentially related to gubernaculum dysfunction. ACUM is specifically classified by Acién's system, though rare variants necessitate continued international research to refine classification frameworks. Objectives: This consensus aims to develop good clinical practice recommendations for the pathophysiology, terminology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of ACUM. Methods: A working group consisted of Chinese and European experts, after approval from the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, developed recommendations based on the best available evidence and experts' opinion. Results: Patients with ACUM present with typical symptoms such as dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia, and atypical symptoms, including gastrointestinal and generalised pelvic pain. Diagnostic criteria include isolated cavitated lesions in the anterolateral myometrium near the round ligament, lined by endometrial tissue and filled with haemorrhagic fluid, surrounded by a myometrial mantle with concentric orientation of myometrial fibres, and typically associated with a normal uterine cavity. Diagnosis is most accurately made through ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Surgical excision of the ACUM is considered the definitive treatment offering near-complete symptom resolution, and minimally invasive approach should be preferred when possible. The timing of surgery and the interval before attempting pregnancy remain unclear. The mode of delivery post-surgery is individualised based on the degree of myometrial involvement. Conclusions: The current consensus summarises the existing evidence on ACUM providing good clinical practice recommendations for their management. Existing gaps in the understanding and management of ACUMs, highlight the need for further research to guide clinical decision-making. What is New?: Good clinical practice recommendations for ACUM aiming to understand and optimise their management.

Indexed as

Accessory cavitated uterine malformationadenomyotic cystcyclic pelvic paindysmenorrheaMüllerian anomaliesobstructive anomalies

Identifiers

PMID40495411
PMCPMC12233108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.