ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025
The role of occupational therapists in acute mental health inpatient settings: A systematic scoping review.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The occupational therapy role in acute psychiatric inpatient units in Australia: A mixed methods study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Association of community welfare resources and outpatient occupational therapy with psychiatric length of stay: A nationwide analysis in Japan.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Preparedness of the University of KwaZulu-Natal Occupational Therapy Students and Novice Occupational Therapists for Acute Mental Health Practice: A Qualitative Exploration of Lived Experiences.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
- Exploring Competencies That Prepare Occupational Therapy Students for Acute Mental Health Practice: A Document Analysis.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
- The role of occupational therapists in acute mental health inpatient settings: A systematic scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOccupational therapists play an important role in offering interventions in acute mental health inpatient settings through use of individualised, activity-based, sensory, and group approaches. They may face challenges, however, to implement evidence-based interventions due to high caseload, consumers' short duration of stay, and general limited understanding of the value of occupational therapy interventions. This scoping review aimed to address this gap by answering the following question: 'What evidence is available for occupational therapy interventions within acute mental health inpatient settings?'
methodsThis review used Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review framework. The review question was identified by occupational therapists from two leading mental health settings in Melbourne, Victoria. Three electronic databases, citation searches, and hand searching were used to locate studies that were independently screened by authors. Studies within adult acute inpatient mental health units that examined interventions designed or delivered by occupational therapists were selected. These studies were data extracted, and findings were thematically synthesised. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer and community involvement.
findingsTwenty-one studies relevant to the review question were identified. The findings from these studies were synthesised into five themes: (a) consumers' experiences of occupational therapy interventions; (b) enabling activity engagement and choice; (c) restoring function; (d) reduced need for restrictive practices; and (e) sensory modulation. These themes are discussed in relation to environmental and occupational factors, occupational therapy approaches, and contributions to consumers' recovery.
conclusionThe findings from this review highlighted the pivotal role of occupational therapists in acute inpatient mental health settings in addressing occupational deprivation and functional decline; reducing the need for restrictive practices; enabling self-management strategies to reduce distress; and fostering personal recovery. Understanding of and promoting the unique value of occupational therapy interventions is essential to ensure effective multidisciplinary care within acute mental health settings. Future research is recommended to further explore and investigate effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, barriers to evidence-based practices, and consumers' experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.