Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495374›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.

Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta BorràsBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1999-0185
Sergio RomeroBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Leidy Y SernaBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Joan F AlonsoBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro BachillerBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel A MañanasBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Mónica RojasBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-3566

Funding

Banco Santander FPU-UPCHybridNeuro, a European Union's Horizon 2020 101079392Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2023-150654OB-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorImaginationMotor CortexAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung Adultelectroencephalography (EEG)event related desynchronization (ERD)LORETAmotor execution (ME)motor imagery (MI)motor‐related cortical activitymotor‐related cortical potential (MRCP)

Identifiers

PMID40495374
PMCPMC12152408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.