ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2025
A Work Systems Hierarchy of Controls: Analysis of Risk Controls Developed by Paramedics.
Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond risk reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The CoWork musculoskeletal health model.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe hierarchy of control (HOC) is a fundamental construct in work health and safety practice and central for employers to manage risk to the health and safety of workers in Australia, to fulfil their legal obligations. The current HOC has been identified as more effective for developing risk controls for physical hazards than for psychosocial hazards.
methodsTo address this limitation, this study involved development and testing of a more comprehensive hierarchy of risk control. The work systems hierarchy of control (WS-HOC) includes three hierarchical levels; elimination, re-design of systems and individual actions. Non-hierarchical categories within levels were developed to distinguish different risk control options, suitable for both physical and psychosocial hazards. Using the WS-HOC, risk controls developed by paramedics to address physical and psychosocial hazards associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were analyzed. These risk controls were developed using the APHIRM (A Participative Hazard Identification and Risk Management) toolkit in an ambulance service.
resultsThe WS-HOC provided a single, contemporary, nuanced approach to evaluating the risk controls for paramedics and their likely effectiveness, regardless of the type of hazard.
conclusionsThis novel approach provides an alternative to previous attempts at supplementing the HOC to improve its application to psychosocial hazards. Further evaluation is required by both practitioners and researchers to examine its utility for other, different occupations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.