Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495265›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2025

Determining modulus of elasticity using finite element analysis and non-destructive testing: Are aquatic animal whiskers stiffer?

Robyn A Grant, Charlotte Brassey, Victor G Goss, Eugene L Starostin, Tom Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Vibrissal sensing in mammals in a changing world.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robyn A GrantFaculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3968-8370
Charlotte BrasseyFaculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Victor G GossSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Eugene L StarostinSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Tom AllenFaculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Royal Society APX\R1\211187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximating the stiffness of biological materials can give important insights into how structures deform and when they may fail. Some samples may be too precious to test to destruction, or too fine to position accurately for conventional material testing, which makes it challenging to obtain approximations of material stiffness. Using two-dimensional scans, non-destructive bending tests, and finite element (FE) modeling, we show that we can approximate the modulus of elasticity of samples by fitting FE model data to that of experimental bend tests. We demonstrate our protocol on representative whiskers from three species of Carnivorans, including a terrestrial red fox, semi-aquatic Eurasian otter, and aquatic phocid grey seal. Grey seal whiskers had the highest approximated modulus of elasticity (0.5-19 GPa), followed by Eurasian otter (0.5-13 GPa) and red fox (0.1-1.5 GPa). We suggest that, as in many other biological structures, adaptations in both the shape and material stiffness of the whisker contribute to how it bends when loaded. Specifically, a larger base radius and higher material stiffness both act to increase whisker flexural rigidity in the aquatic grey seal. This protocol has broad applications in comparative biology and provides a way to determine shape and material stiffness information for various flexible specimen types.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusVibrissaeAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisFoxesSeals, Earlessbend* testsbiomechanicscarnivoraflexural rigiditypinnipedsvibrissa*

Identifiers

PMID40495265
PMCPMC12588165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.