SynthesisSystematic reviews2025
Post-abortion family planning use and its determinants among women who received abortion care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence and determinants of post-abortion family planning utilization among women of reproductive age in Africa: an umbrella review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Abortion providers as human rights defenders: policy priorities for South Africa.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-abortion family planning (PAFP) refers to the use of modern contraceptive methods, preferably immediately following an abortion and within 48 h of the abortion, or before fertility returns. It is highly recommended to delay pregnancy for at least 6 months following an induced or spontaneous abortion to reduce the occurrence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a high burden of unsafe abortions and an unintended pregnancy rate. Additionally, there are inconsistent study findings that have been done to investigate the prevalence and determinant factors of post-abortion family planning use in the region.
methodsThis systematic review followed standard methods and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol for this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number CRD42024518297. The eligible publications were searched by PubMed, Research4Life, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. The data were extracted using Microsoft Excel 2019 and analyzed using Stata software version 17. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Publication bias was assessed by using the funnel plot and Egger's test. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning. The I
resultsThis systematic review and meta-analysis included 80 eligible articles from 16 sub-Saharan African countries, with a total of 248,299 study participants. The pooled prevalence of post-abortion family planning use in sub-Saharan Africa was 60.67% (95% CI 55.61-65.73). In addition, the commonly adopted contraception methods after abortion were injectables, 34.98% (95% CI 27.59, 42.37), followed by 20.71% (95% CI 17.20, 24.22) of oral contraception pills, and 20.38% (95% CI 16.82, 23.94) utilized implants. Women aged 15-24 years (AOR = 3.40, 95% CI 2.12, 5.44), being married (AOR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.68, 4.34), attaining secondary school (AOR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.62, 4.66) and college or above (AOR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.85, 4.62), unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 5.03, 95% CI 2.93, 8.61), having prior history of abortion (AOR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.35, 2.62), having good knowledge about family planning (AOR = 2.86, 95% CI 2.37, 3.46), prior family planning use (AOR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.62, 5.58), positive attitude towards family planning methods (AOR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.81, 4.28), partner support (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.64, 3.30), and received post-abortion family planning counseling (AOR = 2.86, 95% CI 2.37, 3.46) were predictors that significantly associated with contraceptive utilization following abortion.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that the pooled prevalence of post-abortion contraception use in sub-Saharan Africa remains low. Therefore, appropriate planning and implementation of effective strategies are crucial to scaling up post-abortion family planning use, including improving educational attainment, advocating for post-abortion contraceptive methods, and providing effective post-abortion family planning counseling. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024518297.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.