ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Admission glucose is a significant outcome predictor in anterior circulation stroke: approaching the sweet spot.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedure time and 90-day outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for large-core stroke.European stroke journal · 2026Observational
- Anesthesia Considerations in Older Adults Undergoing Emergency Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- Preoperative multimodal CT for selection of acute anterior circulation occlusion stroke patients for mechanical thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdmission glycemia has emerged as an important outcome predictor in the context of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusions (LVO) in ischemic stroke. However, a clinically relevant threshold of glucose levels to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcome has yet to be established.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, monocentric, consecutive registry-based analysis of patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO. Good outcome was defined as functional independence after 90 days (90d mRS < 3) or no deterioration from premorbid mRS. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between admission glucose levels and functional outcome, including for well-established outcome predictors, i.e. age, NIHSS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), time to reperfusion, unsuccessful recanalization, presence of bleeding, and diabetes. In addition, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal admission glucose threshold that best discriminates patients at risk for poor outcome, maximizing sensitivity and specificity.
resultsWe analyzed 509 patients (mean age = 74.3 ± 12.6 years, median previous mRS = 1.5, 48% male). 194 patients (38.1%) had good outcome and 315 (61.9%) had poor outcome. According to the logistic regression admission glucose (p = 0.012, OR 1.009 95% CI [1.002 1.016]) contributed to predicting poor outcome, while known diabetes did not show a significant contribution. The ROC analysis revealed an admission glucose of 117 mg/dL (59.7% sensitivity; 58% specificity) to be the optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients at risk for poor outcome with an OR of 2.3.
conclusionAdmission hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome after MT for LVO in the anterior circulation. We hypothesize, that optimal glucose values in patients undergoing MT will likely be in the low normoglycemic range. Prospective controlled studies with targeted glucose values will be needed for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.