ArticleJournal of physiological anthropology2025
Longitudinal actigraphy study on sleep patterns under reduced social restrictions in Japanese university students.
Article in Journal of physiological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep deprivation and irregular sleep patterns can adversely affect physical and mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic presented a naturalistic opportunity to examine how reduced social time restrictions influence sleep behavior. This study aimed to investigate both group-level and individual-level changes in sleep patterns among Japanese university students before and during the pandemic and to explore how individual characteristics may contribute to these changes.
methodsTwenty-two female university students wore waist-worn actigraphy devices for approximately 16 weeks in both 2019 and 2020. Objective sleep data were collected alongside questionnaire assessments of chronotype, personality traits, and subjective sleep feeling.
resultsIn total, 4,432 valid days of actigraphy data were analyzed. Compared with the pre-pandemic year, sleep timing was delayed by approximately 20 min for bed-in time and 40 min for bed-out time in 2020. Time in bed (TIB) increased by about 20 min, while total sleep time (TST) remained largely unchanged. Sleep efficiency declined, but subjective sleep feeling remained stable. Individual-level analyses revealed substantial variability: 9 of 22 participants showed significant changes in TST, with both increases and decreases observed. Increased TIB was associated with later bed-out time, shorter baseline sleep duration, and lower neuroticism. A later bed-in time was associated with reduced TST.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that while social time restrictions can influence sleep timing and duration, the effects vary considerably across individuals. Earlier bedtimes may be more effective than simply extending TIB in promoting adequate sleep. Furthermore, individual characteristics such as personality traits may play a role in sleep adaptation under changing social contexts. Given the diversity of responses observed, both group- and individual-level perspectives are essential for understanding sleep behavior in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.