ArticleBMC public health2025
Hybrid time series and machine learning models for forecasting cardiovascular mortality in India: an age specific analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling of medical waste and a proposal to improve segregation in a peruvian hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heat stress and cardiovascular hospitalizations in a semi-arid megacity: a multi-method epidemiological and machine-learning analysis in Isfahan, Iran.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Modeling and forecasting neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: a comparative study using statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Predicting the severity of COVID-19 using machine learning methods.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Temporal trends, disparities, and ARIMA forecasts of mortality among U.S. adults with coexisting hematologic malignancy and heart failure, 1999-2023, with projections to 2033.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a primary cause of death in India, accounting for a significant portion of the global CVD burden. This study looks at statistics on heart disease mortality from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) from 1990 to 2021, divided into five age groups: 0-5, 6-15, 16-49, 50-69, and 70 + . We used both classic ARIMA and hybrid models that combined ARIMA with machine learning techniques such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GARCH to anticipate mortality trends. Model performance was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Across several age groups, the ARIMA + SVM model outperformed standalone ARIMA in terms of accuracy, with RMSE improvements of up to 15.6%. The 70 + population has the greatest mortality rates, highlighting the urgent need for focused healthcare treatments. These hybrid models are valuable tools for healthcare legislators in developing preventative programs, allocating resources effectively, and prioritizing treatment for high-risk age groups, especially the elderly, since they improve forecasting accuracy and offer interpretive insights. Given India's growing cardiovascular disease load, our results highlight how predictive analytics may support data-driven public health planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.