Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495146›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Hybrid time series and machine learning models for forecasting cardiovascular mortality in India: an age specific analysis.

M Darshan Teja, G Mokesh Rayalu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting the severity of COVID-19 using machine learning methods.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Darshan TejaDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.
G Mokesh RayaluDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India. mokesh.g@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a primary cause of death in India, accounting for a significant portion of the global CVD burden. This study looks at statistics on heart disease mortality from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) from 1990 to 2021, divided into five age groups: 0-5, 6-15, 16-49, 50-69, and 70 + . We used both classic ARIMA and hybrid models that combined ARIMA with machine learning techniques such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GARCH to anticipate mortality trends. Model performance was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Across several age groups, the ARIMA + SVM model outperformed standalone ARIMA in terms of accuracy, with RMSE improvements of up to 15.6%. The 70 + population has the greatest mortality rates, highlighting the urgent need for focused healthcare treatments. These hybrid models are valuable tools for healthcare legislators in developing preventative programs, allocating resources effectively, and prioritizing treatment for high-risk age groups, especially the elderly, since they improve forecasting accuracy and offer interpretive insights. Given India's growing cardiovascular disease load, our results highlight how predictive analytics may support data-driven public health planning.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForecastingHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedARIMACardiovascularError MeasuresForecastingMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40495146
PMCPMC12150534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.