ArticleBMC public health2025
Socioeconomic factors predictive of access delays in oncology.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Progress Index as a Determinant of Healthcare Access and Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- A population-based study on the impact of social determinants of health on time to treatment of stage I lung cancer in Ontario, Canada.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Barriers to Occupational and Physical Therapy Utilization for Children With Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Factors affecting lung cancer stage at diagnosis and receipt of surgery in Ontario: A population-based analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify demographic and socioeconomic factors predictive of access delays in patients referred for radiation oncology services. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective data registry of consecutive patients referred for initial consultation from October 2018 to April 2022 was reviewed. To evaluate access, the number of business days from referral to consultation was calculated. Demographic characteristics recorded included age, gender, race, language preference, and insurance status. Zip code data linked to a patient's residential address was used to classify socioeconomic status (SES) based on publicly available data on median household income. Descriptive statistics were presented to identify factors predictive of delays in the time from referral to consultation.
resultsA total of 9,241 consecutive patients were referred and logged into the database during the 4-year period, of which 5,321 were scheduled, registered, and seen in the outpatient setting. Delays in access were associated with low SES and Black race (p < 0.05, for both). Three hundred and seventeen of the 1,203 patients (26%) in the lowest SES quartile had their appointments scheduled greater than 21 days from the time of referral compared to 482 of the 4,118 patients (12%) in the non-lowest quartile SES group (p < 0.001). Black patients were significantly less likely to have their appointments within 5 days compared to non-Black patients (17% versus 24%, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, the only variable independently associated with higher odds of appointment delays was SES (low-SES quartile versus non-low-SES quartile (OR = 3.98, 95% CI [2.01-7.92], p < 0.001).
conclusionsSES factors related to geographical zip code predict for access delays in radiation oncology care. Targeted interventions are urgently warranted for low SES groups residing in underserved communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.