ArticleMalaria journal2025
Improving the utilization of insecticide-treated nets for malaria prevention among pregnant women, lactating mothers and children in Sierra Leone: a commentary.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria in pregnancy poses significant public health challenges with severe consequences for mothers, fetuses, and newborns. Despite the proven efficacy of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), the coverage rate among pregnant women, lactating mothers and young children in sub-Saharan Africa remains suboptimal. For example, in Sierra Leone, only 52% of pregnant women and 50% of children under five years utilize ITNs. This coverage rate fell short of the national target, in which at least 80% of pregnant women are expected to report sleeping under an ITN. While considerable research has examined ITN access and usage in the general SSA population, focused implementation research on these high-risk groups in Sierra Leone is notably lacking. Addressing this gap is vital for enhancing intervention effectiveness and achieving sustained malaria control. The authors of this commentary recommend that further implementation research is needed to investigate the barriers and enabling factors to ITN adoption and utilization in pregnant women, lactating mothers and children under five years of age. Implementation research is crucial for understanding the gap between ITN access and actual use, enabling the design of effective and equitable interventions to boost utilization rates. Implementation research anchored in frameworks like Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) offers a pathway to decode these complexities, ensuring that global strategies resonate with local realities. By centering the voices of pregnant women, lactating mothers, and caregivers as well as addressing structural, cultural, and logistical barriers, Sierra Leone can transform ITN coverage into tangible reductions in malaria morbidity and mortality, advancing equity in its march toward elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.