SynthesisBiological trace element research2026
Unraveling the Puzzle: a Systematic Review of the Carcinogenic Role of Arsenic in Head and Neck Cancers.
Synthesis in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic exposure has been implicated in various malignancies, including head and neck cancers (HNCs). However, the association between arsenic exposure and HNC development remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess the relationship between arsenic exposure and the risk of developing HNCs. This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to January 2025 to identify relevant studies. Observational studies reporting the association between arsenic and HNCs were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the NIH criteria. A total of 24 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 35,641 cases and 4,631 controls. The mean age of cases was 50.3 years, while controls had a mean age of 57.7 years. Nineteen studies assessed nasopharyngeal/laryngeal cancers, and 13 investigated oral cancers. Environmental/occupational arsenic exposure was reported in 14 studies, while 11 studies measured arsenic levels in biological samples. Geographical differences in exposure outcomes were observed, with significant associations reported in studies from Tunisia, Chile, Brazil, and Taiwan, while studies from the UK, Finland, and a multicenter European study found no significant relationship. Blood, hair, soil, and drinking water arsenic concentrations varied across studies, with inconsistent findings. The findings suggest a potential link between arsenic exposure and HNCs, particularly in regions with high environmental contamination. However, heterogeneity in exposure assessment and study design limits definitive conclusions. Further well-controlled studies are needed to clarify the association and underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40495107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.