Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495101›Full record

SynthesisForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Identification of human remains in case of transgender individuals in forensic anthropology: a systematic review.

Viana Elisabetta, Selvaggi Gennaro, Milani Chantal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viana ElisabettaNational institute of family pedagogy (INPEF), Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7759-8516
Selvaggi GennaroDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-7095
Milani ChantalNational institute of family pedagogy (INPEF), Rome, Italy. milanich@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-1808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During anthropological analysis of human skeletal remains, sex assessment is a key step in forensic identification of individuals. For transgender individuals, complications can arise during the estimation of biological sex, as physical characteristics may not correspond with the documented gender recorded at registration of the missing person with authorities. In this systematic review, we analyzed the current literature focusing on methods employed for state-of-the-art identification of skeletal remains of transgender and gender-diverse individuals in forensic anthropology, including the effects on the skeleton of gender-affirming hormone therapy and/or facial gender-affirmation surgery. Our findings support the need for additional studies using larger sample sizes and control groups involving different treatment regimens or longitudinal studies at different follow-up intervals. Furthermore, studies suggest that the impact of surgery involving the skull may provide identifying elements due either to the presence of surgical artifacts, traces of materials used for implants, or the possible incongruence with the pelvis in cases of sex estimation. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of these anatomical aspects on outcomes related to forensic anthropology.

Indexed as

Body RemainsForensic AnthropologySex Determination by SkeletonTransgender PersonsFemaleGender-Affirming ProceduresGender-Affirming SurgeryHumansMaleFacial feminization surgeryFacial gender-affirming surgeryForensic anthropologyGender-affirming hormone therapyGender-affirming surgeryGender diversitySex assessmentTransgender

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.