Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495039›Full record

ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

The burnout: a silent saboteur in in vitro fertilization laboratories.

Murat Basar, Tuba Duzcu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murat BasarDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. murat.basar@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-409X
Tuba DuzcuDepartment of Health Management, Istanbul Medipol University, School of Health Sciences, 34810, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryologists operate in highly demanding environments where burnout is an increasingly recognized occupational hazard. This review aims to delineate the types, causes, and consequences of burnout among embryologists, compare burnout prevalence across medical laboratory specialties, and propose evidence-based strategies for mitigation, emphasizing its impact on patient outcomes and laboratory performance. A comprehensive literature review synthesized findings from cross-sectional surveys, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and consensus guidelines related to burnout in healthcare and laboratory settings. Special focus was given to embryology-specific data, including occupational stressors, emotional labor, and workload metrics. Comparative analyses were performed to contextualize embryologist burnout within broader laboratory medicine. Embryologists report the highest emotional burnout levels among assisted reproductive technology (ART) professionals. Contributing factors include excessive workloads, irregular hours, outcome visibility, ethical dilemmas, limited career progression, and poor interdepartmental communication. Burnout negatively affects cognitive performance, psychomotor precision, protocol adherence, and communication, directly impacting IVF outcomes. High-burnout laboratories show increased witnessing discrepancies and reduced patient satisfaction. Evidence suggests that burnout is not only a personnel issue but also a critical quality and safety concern. Burnout in IVF laboratories is a systemic issue that compromises embryologist well-being and ART success. Multilevel interventions-spanning organizational policies, regulatory frameworks, leadership development, and technological innovations-are essential. Integrating burnout assessment into routine quality assurance and regulatory monitoring can enhance staff sustainability and patient care outcomes in reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalFertilization in VitroFemaleHumansLaboratoriesReproductive Techniques, AssistedWorkloadAssisted reproductive technologyBurnout managementEmbryologist burnoutIVF success ratesLaboratory KPIsVienna consensusWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40495039
PMCPMC12423373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.