ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2025
Cost-Effectiveness of a Universal School-Based Mental Health Prevention Program: An Economic Modeling Study in a Limited Income Context.
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a school-based mental health prevention program in a limited income context to inform investment decisions.
methodsThe Resourceful Adolescent Program, an evidence-based resilience intervention designed for adolescents, was culturally adapted as Happy House (HH) in a two-arm, controlled trial in selected high schools in Vietnam. A Markov model assessed HH's cost-effectiveness in preventing depression compared with doing nothing from a societal perspective over 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. The model underwent face, internal, and cross-validation with experts in health economics, mental health, and education. Effect size was drawn from the HH trial, utility values from an EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) survey of 1004 adolescents and systematic reviews, and costs from the HH trial and Vietnam data. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were expressed in 2020 Vietnamese dong (VND) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, with costs and benefits discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses and a scenario on nationwide HH scaling were also conducted.
resultsCompared with do-nothing, HH had ICERs of 43.8 million VND (US $5512), 30.4 million VND (US $3831), and 22.9 million VND (US $2886) per QALY gained over 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons, respectively. Nationwide scaling reduced ICERs to 27.6 million VND (US $3470), 18.8 million VND (US $2370), and 13.5 million VND (US $1698) per QALY over the same periods. ICERs were sensitive to changes in effect size, disease incidence, and intervention costs. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were robust despite parameter uncertainty and variations in key assumptions
conclusionsInvesting in a universal school-based mental health prevention program is cost-effective compared with doing nothing in a limited income context such as Vietnam. Scaling up HH implementation amidst rising depression incidence further enhances the cost-effectiveness of this investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40495035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.