Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495030›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Preclinical evaluation of small molecule inhibitors as early intervention therapeutics against Russell's viper envenoming in India.

Gotravalli V Rudresha, Suyog Khochare, Nicholas R Casewell, Kartik Sunagar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gotravalli V RudreshaEvolutionary Venomics Lab, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Suyog KhochareEvolutionary Venomics Lab, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Nicholas R CasewellCentre for Snakebite Research & Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, L3 5QA, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-4719
Kartik SunagarEvolutionary Venomics Lab, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. ksunagar@iisc.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0998-1581

Funding

DBT India Alliance (Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance) IA/I/19/2/504647Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebites are problematic in many developing regions, including India, where over half of global snakebite deaths occur. Antivenoms are currently the only licensed treatment for snakebites. However, their use causes several challenges, most notably geographical limitations in efficacy and adverse side effects. Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are urgently needed. Recently, several studies have evaluated small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) and highlighted their promise as safe and effective alternatives to antivenoms. We investigate their potential use against Indian snakes, particularly Russell's viper (Daboia russelii), responsible for over half of India's snakebite cases.

methodsHere, we explored the effectiveness of two phase-2-approved SMIs in countering the diverse and variable toxicities of D. russelii from across India.

resultsThe phospholipase inhibitor varespladib and the metalloproteinase inhibitor marimastat, individually or in combination, effectively counter the toxicities of D. russelii venoms in vitro. Specific drug efficacy varies across geographic regions. These SMIs and their combination prevent lethality caused by the pan-Indian D. russelii, even in rescue experiments where treatment is delayed, in mice.

conclusionsOur findings support the potential use of SMIs as effective, affordable, and accessible future therapies for treating bites from the world's most medically important snake species.

Identifiers

PMID40495030
PMCPMC12152178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.