SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Non-invasive prediction of nuclear grade in renal cell carcinoma using CT-Based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-Based Peritumoral and Perirenal Fat Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Grade, Stage, and Adherent Perinephric Fat Prediction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- An interpretable contrast-enhanced CT radiomics-based pipeline incorporating automatic segmentation for predicting ISUP grade group in ccRCC.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents the most prevalent malignant neoplasm of the kidney, with a rising global incidence. Tumor nuclear grade is a crucial prognostic factor, guiding treatment decisions, but current histopathological grading via biopsy is invasive and prone to sampling errors. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance and quality of CT-based radiomics for preoperatively predicting RCC nuclear grade. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up until 19 April 2025. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 and METRICS tools. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate model performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results from separate validation cohorts were pooled, and clinical and combined models were analyzed separately in distinct analyses.
resultsA total of 26 studies comprising 1993 individuals in 10 external and 16 internal validation cohorts were included. Meta-analysis of radiomics models showed pooled AUC of 0.88, sensitivity of 0.78, and specificity of 0.82. Clinical and combined (clinical-radiomics) models showed AUCs of 0.73 and 0.86, respectively. QUADAS-2 revealed significant risk of bias in the Index Test and Flow and Timing domains. METRICS scores ranged from 49.7 to 88.4%, with an average of 66.65%, indicating overall good quality, though gaps in some aspects of study methodologies were identified.
conclusionThis study suggests that radiomics models show great potential and diagnostic accuracy for non-invasive preoperative nuclear grading of RCC. However, challenges related to generalizability and clinical applicability remain, as further research with standardized methodologies, external validation, and larger cohorts is needed to enhance their reliability and integration into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40495027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.