ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Stone-free rate after RIRS: a multivariable analysis and predictive nomogram from a single-center study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a calibrated logistic regression clinical risk score for predicting postoperative sepsis following retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Re: Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- Research progress on treating urinary system stones using ureteroscopy combined With a negative-pressure suction sheath.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Comment on: "Stone-free rate after RIRS: a multivariable analysis and predictive nomogram from a single-center study".World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Comment on: "Stone-free rate after RIRS: a multivariable analysis and predictive nomogram from a single-center study".World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success with a machine learning nomogram: A pilot study.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveResidual stone after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) is a major challenge. This study evaluates key predictors of residual stones and develops a nomogram-based risk stratification model. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of 274 patients undergoing RIRS for renal calculi (2021-2024) was conducted. Demographic, clinical and radiological variables were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify predictors. A nomogram was developed and validated using Python libraries, with performance assessed via concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots.
resultsStone volume > 498 mm³ (AUC: 0.819, OR: 6.34, p < 0.001), IPA ≤ 44° (OR: 7.81, p = 0.005) and multiple stony calyces (OR: 2.38, p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of residual stones. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.839) and stratified patients into four risk categories (0-150 + points), with stone-free rates ranging from > 85% (low-risk) to < 40% (high-risk). ROC analysis highlighted stone volume (AUC: 0.819) as superior to stone size (AUC: 0.793).
conclusionThe nomogram integrating stone volume, IPA and calyceal involvement provides a clinically usable tool for predicting residual stones post-RIRS. Preoperative use of this model may enhance surgical outcomes by guiding personalized treatment strategies and enables the surgeon to inform the patient more accurately about the expected outcome of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40495007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.