ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Economic analysis of an AI-enabled ECG alert system: impact on mortality outcomes from a pragmatic randomized trial.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05118035 (Applying an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiographic System for Reducing Mortality), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Applying an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiographic System for Reducing Mortality: a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography from scientific research to clinical application.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Irreversible March of Time: Ischemic Delay and Impact on Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Findings from a previous study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05118035) demonstrated that an AI-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG), combining AI reports and physician alerts, effectively identified hospitalized patients at high risk of mortality and reduced all-cause mortality. This study evaluates its cost-effectiveness from the health payer's perspective in Taiwan over a 90-day post-intervention period. Cost data were obtained from electronic health records of participating hospitals, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per death averted were calculated. Non-parametric bootstrap techniques were used to address uncertainty. Among 15,965 patients, 90-day all-cause mortality was 3.6% in the intervention group versus 4.3% in controls. Medication and ICU costs were higher in the AI-ECG group, but overall medical cost was similar ($6204 vs. $5803). The ICER was $59,500 (95% CI: $-4657 to $385,950) per death averted. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that 95% of the probability mass lies below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $409,321, supporting favorable cost-effectiveness despite uncertainty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.