ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Postural stability during illusory self-motion-interactions of vision and touch.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of vision in stabilizing balance has long been recognized, and previous studies have shown that non-supportive fingertip touch can enhance postural stability. However, the interaction between haptic feedback and the illusion of self-motion remains underexplored. We investigated how different phases of visual motion (no motion, visual motion, self-rotation and displacement illusion), motion order (stationary first vs. motion first), and fingertip cutaneous feedback jointly influence balance and the dynamics of haptic contact. Using a head-mounted display, we presented a virtual room that rotated around the standing participants' vertical axis. Participants viewing the rotating scene soon experience illusory self-motion and displacement. We examined how the moving visual scene destabilized posture and how it interacted with tactile cues that typically stabilize balance. Our findings revealed differential effects in classical and stochasticity-sensitive analyses. Postural regulation was distinctly influenced by motion phase, order, and tactile feedback. Changes in motion perception-no motion, visual motion, and apparent self-rotation-were linked to both classical and stochastic aspects of postural sway. In contrast, motion order specifically influenced balance metrics encoding stochasticity, with no effect on those filtering out stochastic variability. Notably, the influence of past visual motion perception persisted, affecting postural sway even after motion ceased. The stabilizing effects of touch were reaffirmed, and motion perception significantly influenced the applied touch forces. Both stochastic and non-stochastic attributes of balance and touch force are responsive to visual motion perturbations and illusions, though motion order exclusively affects stochastic dynamics. These findings provide insights into multisensory interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.