ArticleCommunications medicine2025
T-cell responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 index-virus nanoparticle protein vaccine to the ancestral and omicron variants 6 months following primary vaccination.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation and immunological evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 membrane protein virus-like particles.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical Manifestations and Cytokine Profiles of the Th1, Th2, and Th17 Response Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariants.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 index-virus nanoparticle protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) induces humoral and cell-mediated immune responses that protect against severe COVID-19, including from SARS-CoV-2 variants. Limited information exists on NVX-CoV2373-induced cell-mediated immune responses to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron variant following a homologous booster (third dose), and on T-cell responses following a booster dose compared to a single dose.
methodsT-cell responses were investigated in participants from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2A/2B trial of NVX-CoV2373 in South Africa, who had a blinded crossover at 6 months post-enrolment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were available for 34 participants, 7 days post-vaccination with one NVX-CoV2373 dose (n = 17) or a homologous booster (n = 17). T-cell responses to the full-length spike (FLS) glycoprotein of ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 and mutated spike protein regions found in Omicron (BA.4/BA.5) were characterised by intracellular cytokine staining.
resultsHere we show that FLS-specific T-cell responses are similar between single-dose and booster-dose recipients (CD4
conclusionsNVX-CoV2373-induced T-cell responses to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 are comparable following vaccination with a single dose compared with a third dose administered 6 months after the second dose. Our findings suggest that an NVX-CoV2373 booster dose does not enhance T-cell immunity. Furthermore, NVX-CoV2373 vaccination induces greater T-cell response magnitudes to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, from which the vaccine is derived, compared with the Omicron variant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.