Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40494910›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025

Reducing the risk of sudden unexpected infant death: the caffeine hypothesis.

Thomas Hegyi, Barbara M Ostfeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas HegyiThe Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. hegyith@rwjms.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-1043
Barbara M OstfeldThe Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review proposes that intermittent hypoxia is the primary pathogenic mechanism driving Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Intermittent hypoxia is a powerful source of molecular and cellular injury and is frequently experienced by infants, especially under conditions associated with known SIDS risk factors such as prone sleeping, respiratory infections, and prenatal nicotine exposure. These factors often trigger hypoxic episodes that may impair autonomic regulation, hinder arousal from sleep, and damage critical neural circuits. By integrating current data, this review highlights the central role of intermittent hypoxia in SIDS pathophysiology. Additionally, it evaluates the potential of caffeine, a respiratory stimulant and adenosine receptor antagonist, as a protective intervention to reduce SIDS risk by enhancing respiratory stability and arousal capacity.

Indexed as

CaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsHypoxiaSudden Infant DeathFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsCaffeineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID40494910
PMCPMC12660142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.