Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40494908›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Deep learning-based ranking method for subgroup and predictive biomarker identification in patients.

Zihuan Liu, Yihua Gu, Xin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zihuan LiuData and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA. zihuan.liu@abbvie.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-1477
Yihua GuData and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Xin HuangData and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe task of identifying patient subgroups with enhanced treatment responses is important for clinical drug development. However, existing deep learning-based approaches often struggle to provide clear biological insights. This study aims to develop a deep learning method that not only captures treatment effect differences among individuals but also helps uncover meaningful biological markers associated with those differences.

methodsWe introduce DeepRAB, a deep learning-based framework designed for exploring treatment effect heterogeneity by constructing individualized treatment rule (ITR). In addition, DeepRAB enables model interpretability by facilitating predictive biomarker identification. We evaluate its performance using simulated datasets that vary in complexity, treatment effect strength, and sample size. We also apply the method to the adalimumab (Humira, AbbVie) hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical trial data, analyzing patient characteristics and treatment outcomes.

resultsIn analyses of simulated data under various scenarios, our findings show the effective performance of DeepRAB for subgroup exploration, and its capability to uncover predictive biomarkers when compared to existing approaches. When applied to the real clinical trial data, DeepRAB demonstrates its practical usage in identifying important predictive biomarkers and boosting model prediction performance.

conclusionsOur research provides a promising approach for subgroup identification and predictive biomarker discovery by leveraging deep learning. This approach may support more targeted treatment strategies in clinical research and enhance decision-making in personalized medicine.

Identifiers

PMID40494908
PMCPMC12152138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.