ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2025
Unveiling the ecological processes driving soil and lichen microbiome assembly along an urbanization gradient.
Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors shaping the lichen photobiome and mycobiome in a tropical lichen community.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Functional redundancy and stability support the resilience of the Evernia prunastri holobiont under urbanization.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Review
- Urban land use influences microbial functional traits along a management intensity gradient.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Article
- Mycobiomes of Six Lichen Species from the Russian Subarctic: A Culture-Independent Analysis and Cultivation Study.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deciphering Soil Keystone Microbial Taxa: Structural Diversity and Co-Occurrence Patterns from Peri-Urban to Urban Landscapes.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global biodiversity loss is accelerating due to the transformation of natural landscapes into agricultural and urban areas. Yet, research on the urbanization impact on environmental and host-associated microbiomes, particularly on the ecological processes that mediate their assembly and function, remains scarce. This study investigated the effects of an urbanization gradient on the diversity and assembly processes of the soil microbiome and the microbiomes of three epiphytic lichen species (Candelaria concolor, Physcia adscendens, and Xanthoria parietina). Our findings revealed that the urbanization gradient shaped the soil microbiome, while the lichen microbiomes exhibited strong host specificity and showed no significant changes in diversity along the urbanization gradient. Heterogeneous selection and dispersal limitation primarily governed the soil community assembly and higher community turnover in medium- and highly urbanized zones compared to low-urbanized zones, indicating an increased influence of environmental pressures, altered resources, and habitat fragmentation in more urbanized areas. The lichen microbiome assembly in each species was primarily governed by undominated processes regardless of urbanization level, indicating that both selection and stochasticity contributed to, but neither dominantly influenced, their assembly. The lichen microbiomes further revealed species-specific co-occurrence networks, with microbial compositional signatures and potential functions being essential for lichen fitness and urban ecosystem health. Taken together, our study contributes to understanding how microbial communities are assembled in urban environments, bridging the gap between conceptual theories and empirical findings in the urban ecology of soil and lichen-associated microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.