Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40494842›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025

Predicting atezolizumab response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients using machine learning on integrated tumour gene expression and clinical data.

Chayanit Piyawajanusorn, Ghita Ghislat, Pedro J Ballester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chayanit PiyawajanusornDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ghita GhislatDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Pedro J BallesterDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. p.ballester@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions under Horizon 2020 grant no. LCII_PA4887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atezolizumab is a treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), yet only 23% of mUC patients benefit from it. Worse yet, accurately predicting such responders remains challenging, despite existing biomarkers. Here we employed eight machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict mUC patient response to atezolizumab using tumours' gene expression profiling and clinical data from two independent cohorts. The CART-OMC model developed on the discovery dataset achieved the highest performance, with a validation set Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.437, using the expressions of just 29 ML-selected genes, including CXCL9 and IFNG. Univariate biomarkers like TMB, TNB, and PD-L1 were less predictive with MCCs of 0, 0.316, and 0, respectively. Upon merging these datasets, the best-performing model (LGBM-OMC; MCC of 0.252) also outperformed top modelling approaches such as EaSIeR (MCC ~ 0) and JADBio (MCC of 0.179). We make these promising ML models freely available to predict atezolizumab response in other mUC patients.

Identifiers

PMID40494842
PMCPMC12152156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.