ArticlePsyCh journal2025
The Impact of Lighting Conditions on Users' Alertness and Working Memory in Confined Spaces.
Article in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Lighting Conditions on Users' Alertness and Working Memory in Confined Spaces.PsyCh journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Confined spaces, characterized by limited natural ventilation, the absence of windows, and restricted access to natural light, present distinct challenges. While most studies focus on lighting's effect on sleep, confined spaces are now more often used for short-term work-rest cycles, especially in office settings. This study explores how lighting conditions affect alertness, cognitive performance, and physiological metrics such as heart rate variability (HRV) during work-rest cycles in confined spaces. Participants performed 2-back tasks, psychomotor vigilance tasks (PVT), and completed subjective scales under six lighting conditions, combining two levels of illuminance (300, 500 lx) and three color temperatures (2800, 5000, 6500 K). Results show higher subjective alertness during work with 300 lx and 5000 K. However, lighting conditions did not significantly affect subjective alertness during rest. Objective alertness was better at 300 lx, with 2800 outperforming 5000 K. Working memory accuracy was higher at 5000 compared with 6500 K, and reaction times were faster under 300 lx. Physiological data remained consistent across lighting conditions. These findings can inform future lighting design and management in confined spaces to improve comfort and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.