Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40494736›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Estimation of the value-based price of a blood test for Alzheimer's disease pathology in primary and specialty care in the U.S.

Soeren Mattke, Jiahe Chen, Mark Hanson, Kim G Johnson, Cara Leahy, David A Merrill, Victoria Shada, Jorge G Ruiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soeren MattkeThe USC Brain Health Observatory, USC Dornsife, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: mattke@usc.edu.
Jiahe ChenThe USC Brain Health Observatory, USC Dornsife, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Mark HansonThe USC Brain Health Observatory, USC Dornsife, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Kim G JohnsonDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27514, USA.
Cara LeahyMemorial Healthcare Institute for Neuroscience, Owosso, MI 48867, USA.
David A MerrillPacific Brain Health Center, Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Victoria ShadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Jorge G RuizMemorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL 33021, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood tests for the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as alternative to amyloid PET scans and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. (CSF). However, their economic value, which depends on test accuracy as well as effect on clinical decision-making, remains unclear.

methodsWe use a Markov model to estimate the value-based price of a blood test with sensitivity of 88 % and specificity of 89 %, if labeled for triage and confirmation of the AD pathology in primary and specialty care. The value-based price was defined as price of the test, at which overall diagnostic cost per true positive case of early-stage AD would equate that under standard of care (identification in primary care and referral to specialty care based on the results of a brief cognitive test). Assumptions for the effect of test use on clinical decisions came from a structured expert consultation process.

resultsIf used in primary care, the value-based price would be $290 for a triage and $1150 for a confirmatory test, respectively, as use of PET or CSF testing would decline by 47 % and 86 %, respectively. If used in specialty care, i.e., after confirmation of early-stage cognitive impairment, the overall number of blood tests would decline. Consequently, the value-based price would increase to $450 for a triage test and $1950 for a confirmatory test.

conclusionsThe results project substantial cost savings from implementing a blood test for AD pathology within the diagnostic pathway based on modeling results, which future research should confirm with actual data.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHematologic TestsPrimary Health CareHumansMarkov ChainsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited StatesAlzheimer’s diseaseBlood biomarkerCost-effectivenessEconomic value

Identifiers

PMID40494736
PMCPMC12321617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.