Trial reportEuropean urology oncology2026
A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Trial Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Delivered in 4 Versus 2 Weeks (SHORTER): Acute Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Patient-reported Outcomes at a Single Institution.
Trial report in European urology oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute toxicity and quality of life in postoperative prostate cancer patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSome patients undergoing prostatectomy develop biochemical recurrence or have persistently detectable prostate-specific antigen level. Salvage radiotherapy (RT), delivered over ≥4 wk, is a current standard of care. Our objective was to demonstrate that salvage RT delivered in a five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen does not significantly increase patient-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared with a 20-fraction regimen (HYPO).
methodsIn this randomized noninferiority study, 137 patients were randomized 1:1 to salvage RT with 32.5 Gy in five fractions or 55 Gy in 20 fractions. We report acute changes in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at 3 and 6 mo. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The difference in the changes in EPIC GU scores between SBRT and HYPO was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.53, 1.93), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. The difference in the changes in EPIC GI scores between SBRT and HYPO was 1.16 (95% CI, -5.15, 7.46), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Salvage RT delivered in five fractions was not associated with a significantly worse decline in patient-reported GU or GI toxicities at 3 or 6 mo. Further follow-up is necessary to monitor for potential differences in late toxicity and patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.