ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
The impact of a preprescribing formative assessment on learning in final-year medical students using hospital inpatient electronic prescribing systems.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of a preprescribing formative assessment on learning in final-year medical students using hospital inpatient electronic prescribing systems.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Using assessment in pharmacology to drive learning in the right direction.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Helpful if "Medication took up more space in the course!" - a mixed methods study about pharmacotherapeutic knowledge and digital quizzes for learning and assessment in the medical programme.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsGraduating medical students consistently report being unprepared for the complexity of prescribing in clinical practice. Current clinical prescribing teaching and authentic assessment are limited due to patient safety concerns. We aimed to examine the educational utility of supervised preprescribing as a learning process and potential authentic workplace-based assessment.
methodsStudent preprescriptions and student-authorized prescriptions were extracted from electronic prescribing and administration system data. Patient clinical records were reviewed to identify outcomes of student-authorized prescriptions. All prescription data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Current students, recent graduates (post-graduate year 1 doctors) and supervisors were interviewed to explore of educational impact of supervised preprescribing by inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe live electronic prescribing and administration system was used by 355/370 students over 4 academic years (23 November 2020-19 November 2024). They created 25 324 preprescriptions in 3268 patients. Supervising doctors promoted/authorized 58% (14 684/25324) to live prescriptions. Of 296 student-authorized prescriptions, 33% (97/296) were administered to patients, and only 3% (8/296) were not potentially appropriate. No adverse drug reactions to these 8 prescriptions were documented. The preprescribing model was found to benefit student learning, confidence and identity through 5 themes: Practice, practice, practice, Prescribing with support, Conquering time, Safety protected and Becoming a real medical doctor. DISCUSSION: Supervised preprescribing within clinical settings is feasible and improves student prescribing confidence. Human and system mechanisms managed patient safety concerns and facilitated safe, authentic student preprescribing. This supports inclusion of formative assessment, in the form of supervised preprescribing as authentic workplace-based learning of prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.