ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
The bacterial diversity and potential pathogenic risks of giant panda-infesting ticks.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic insights into pathogen diversity and public health risk of Haemaphysalis longicornis in Gansu Province of China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Microbial transmission among giant panda, sympatric wildlife, and domesticated animals.iScience · 2026Article
- Giant panda seasonal adaptations in feeding strategies and blood physiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As common parasites in the wild, ticks significantly limit the population growth of wild giant pandas and hinder the process of reintroducing captive giant pandas into their natural habitats. Research on microbial communities and pathogens in ticks infesting giant pandas is limited, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive investigation. To thoroughly investigate the microbial communities in giant panda-infesting ticks, particularly potential pathogens, we analyzed 246 ticks collected from the ears of wild-living giant pandas using 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing. We found that the microbial diversity in female ticks was significantly enriched in summer. The microbial community structure carried by ticks is more significantly influenced by seasonal changes than by sex. Metagenomic results indicated that giant pandas have a higher risk of IMPORTANCE: Importance: The emergence of tick-borne bacterial diseases poses a serious threat to the population health of wild-living giant pandas. Ticks are obligate hematophagous ectoparasites that survive by feeding on the blood of various animal hosts and spreading pathogens. Although some previous studies have confirmed that wild ticks carried various viruses, the role of wild giant panda-infesting ticks in the bacterial community remains unknown. Here, the identification of the microbial community and antibiotic resistome in giant panda-infesting ticks revealed that most
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.