ReviewJournal of stroke2025
Anticoagulation Failure in Stroke: Causes, Risk Factors, and Treatment.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asundexian 50 mg for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14,031 patients.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Decoding the causes of ischemic stroke despite ongoing oral anticoagulation and their clinical impact: the ASPERA-R study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Combined Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet for Atrial Fibrillation and Cerebral Atherosclerosis: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of stroke · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Outcomes After Breakthrough Ischemic Stroke on Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: An ASPERA-R Inverse Probability Weighted Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticoagulation is crucial to reducing the risk of cardioembolic strokes, particularly in vulnerable populations such as patients with atrial fibrillation, artificial heart valves, or left ventricular thrombus. Though successful, anticoagulation failure (the occurrence of an ischemic stroke or systemic embolism while receiving therapy) remains a major stroke-care issue. The reason for anticoagulation failure can be below the required threshold, inability to follow up, drug-drug interactions, preexisting hypercoagulable states, or anticoagulant resistance. This failure undermines stroke prevention and requires tailored management, often requiring more drastic or alternative interventions. This review examines what drives anticoagulation failure and explores predictors of this failure in clinical, imaging, and laboratory data. It also discusses current management techniques for improving control and points to new treatments and possible futures, such as high-resolution imaging and personalized medicine based on biomarkers, to help tackle this critical clinical problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.