ReviewJournal of stroke2025
Tenecteplase Beyond 4.5 Hours in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Stroke · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window of 4.5-24 h: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Tenecteplase in the Extended 4.5-24-Hour Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Meta-Analysis of RCTs with EVT-Stratified Subgroup Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in the Extended Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended within 4.5 hours of last known well (LKW) time, many patients present beyond this window.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating tenecteplase (TNK) administration in AIS patients within 4.5 to 24 hours of LKW. The primary outcomes assessed functional independence and ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days.
resultsThree RCTs were included, comprising 1,054 patients (532 TNK and 522 standard medical therapy) with a mean age of 69 years, 59% males, and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10.5. TNK treatment was associated with mRS 0-2 at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.70, P=0.023), indicating a 33% higher likelihood of achieving functional independence. However, the ordinal mRS shift showed no significant difference (standardized mean difference: 0.01, 95% CI: -0.37-0.39, P=0.09). Safety outcomes indicated no difference in the rates of sICH (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 0.86-5.00, P=0.1), and no difference in 90-day mortality (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76-1.53, P=0.67).
conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests TNK might be safe and effective for selected AIS patients in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window, offering improved functional outcomes without a significant increase in hemorrhagic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.