ReviewJournal of stroke2025
Carotid Web: An Update Focusing on Its Relationship With Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Therapeutic Strategy.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Misleading Morphology: Histological Diagnosis Reveals Atherosclerotic Plaque Mimicking Carotid Web.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Intracranial Aneurysms: A Narrative Review of a Dangerous and Underestimated Association.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Fibromuscular dysplasia: Challenges for the current classification.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Intima-Media Thickening with Carotid Webs: A Case Report of a Potentially High-Risk Association.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Carotid Web as a Treatable Etiology of Recurrent Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke Highlighting Neurointervention: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in neurologyArticle
- Clinical and CT angiography characteristics of Chinese stroke patients with carotid web: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid web was described more than 50 years ago as an atypical fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) subtype with highly supporting pathological evidence as intimal FMD. In the following decades, the transition from catheter angiography or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to non-invasive imaging techniques and the dramatic decrease in pathological procedures contributed to the gradual loss of this information. Currently, attention on the carotid web has increased due to its association with cryptogenic ischemic stroke. In fact, the underlying hypothesis is that the morphological features of the carotid web may determine a thrombogenic potential with artery-to-artery embolism. The pathology of the carotid web allowed identification of small thrombi embedded in the web pouch, and the features of thrombi endovascularly retrieved from intracranial arteries are very similar. The diagnosis of carotid web is usually made by non-invasive techniques, such as computed tomography angiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging, requiring the concordance of two different techniques for confirming the diagnosis. DSA is usually considered in cases of diagnostic uncertainty and when interventional treatment of ischemic stroke or carotid web is considered. Treatment options in symptomatic cases include medical therapy (single or dual antiplatelets) or interventional approach (surgery or stenting), but there are no randomized controlled trials about therapy. The main aim of this review is to present the current knowledge on carotid web, retrieving historical data and angiographic classifications of FMD, as well as to discuss the biological plausibility of the association with stroke in symptomatic cases and the need for an updated classification of FMD, together with prospective data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.