ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2025
Pharmaco-economic Inequalities in Access to Antifibrotic Treatment for Interstitial Lung Disease in the Asia-Pacific Region.
Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and genetic features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a Korean cohort.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases in India: national challenges and implications for global health policies.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antifibrotic drugs, available for the best part of the last decade in many parts of the world, have improved outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. However, it is unclear whether patients suffering from these devastating conditions have timely and adequate access to antifibrotic therapy in the Asia-Pacific region (APAC). In this mixed-methods narrative review of 12 APAC countries, integration of questionnaire-based insights of 31 regional clinical experts in interstitial lung disease (ILD) with publicly available pharmaco-economic information has been used to understand how country-specific challenges impact on antifibrotic accessibility. Overall, a broad range of approaches are utilized to provide antifibrotic treatment including centrally or state-determined drug budgets, pharmaceutical industry- subsidized initiatives, charitable support and self-paying (out-of-pocket) options. Impediments to antifibrotic access commonly arise from prohibitive drug pricing in relation to income, absence of universal coverage for pharmaceutical costs, lack of formal pharmaco-economic analysis or restrictions on the use of generic preparations. Unequal access to antifibrotic drugs is a vital unmet therapeutic need in the APAC region, one that is likely to be exacerbated by a rising fibrotic ILD burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.