ArticleExperimental neurology2025
Somatosensory neurons respond heterogeneously to a conditioning lesion.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regeneration of peripheral neurons after a nerve crush is enhanced if the axons have received a prior injury, a phenomenon known as the conditioning lesion response (CLR). Neurons in the mouse L3-L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) that project into the sciatic nerve are commonly used to examine the CLR. These ganglia contain a diverse population of somatosensory neurons, which exhibit dramatic heterogeneity in their response to a CL. As reported previously, the nociceptors [i.e., isolectin B4 binding (IB4+) and calcitonin gene-related peptide positive (CGRP+) neurons] do not show enhanced axonal growth in culture after an in vivo CL, whereas the remaining neurons on average do. We asked whether the failure to produce a CLR was an inherent property of certain neurons. Two difficulties in interpreting previous findings are that only about half of the neurons in these ganglia project into the sciatic nerve and that both IB4 binding and CGRP immunoreactivity decrease after axotomy. Therefore, a possibility not considered previously is that neurons that are still CGRP+ or IB4+ after sciatic nerve transection have not been axotomized. Genetic mutants that express a reporter in CGRP neurons such that its expression is unchanged after axotomy demonstrate that the absence of a CLR is an inherent property of these neurons; however, expression of a reporter in the MrgD (Mas-related gene D)/IB4 neurons demonstrate that these neurons in fact do exhibit a CLR. Among the CGRP-/IB4- neurons, two populations found to exhibit a CLR are tropomyosin receptor kinase C+ (TrkC+) and MrgD+ neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.