ArticleDie Rehabilitation2025
[Development of an agenda for rehabilitation research in the Austrian pension insurance system].
Article in Die Rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research agendas address areas, topics and contents where research is particularly needed. The aim of the study was to develop an organisation-specific research agenda for rehabilitation research in the pension insurance institution (PV), reflecting the research interests of various stakeholders in rehabilitation.The study was developed using a sequential, iterative research design with both qualitative and quantitative components. A narrative literature review and in-depth interviews were conducted with experts from the rehabilitation sector (practice, administration and science). The data generated were analysed, processed and consolidated. A subsequent Delphi survey was conducted in two rounds to identify the priority of potential research. The results were used as a basis for the final formulation of the research agenda.The Delphi survey helped to identify and prioritise a total of 116 concrete research items for inclusion in the research agenda. These were categorised, at progressively higher levels of abstraction, into 32 research topics, eleven research fields and four main research areas namely, Individual, Intervention, Institution and Interdisciplinary research.The interdisciplinary and multi-perspective development of the research agenda enabled a comprehensive exploration of the complex variety of topics/issues in rehabilitation. The research agenda will help to structure future research activities in PV and align them with the needs of the different stakeholders in rehabilitation. The methodological, theoretical and institutional foundations of rehabilitation research are also adressed to enable interdisciplinary research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.