Observational studyThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Elizabethkingia anophelis Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients at a Tertiary Care Center in North India: A Retrospective Study.
Observational study in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence, microbiological features, and clinical characteristics ofInfectious medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elizabethkingia anopheles has recently been recognized as an emerging pathogen linked to neonatal meningitis and bacteremia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the demographic patterns, clinical presentation, and sensitivity patterns of Elizabethkingia anophelis (E. anophelis) isolates at our institution. This retrospective observational study was conducted from 2021 to 2024 at a tertiary care center in Uttar Pradesh. All patients admitted to the intensive care unit who were diagnosed with microbiologically confirmed E. anophelis infection were included in the study. Samples such as blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, ascitic fluid, endotracheal aspirate, wound pus, and cerebrospinal fluid were sent to the Microbiology laboratory for culture and sensitivity testing. Clinical histories of the patients and details regarding bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity results were extracted from the Hospital Information System. A total of 48 inpatients with E. anophelis infection were included. Most of the patients presented with a diagnosis of bacteremia (n = 20; 42%), followed by pneumonia (n = 18; 37.5%). Among the patients with bacteremia (n = 20), 12 (60%) had a catheter in situ at the time of infection and were diagnosed with catheter-related bloodstream infection. The most common risk factor was diabetes mellitus (52%), followed by endotracheal intubation (43.7%) and hypertension (41.7%). The overall 30-day mortality among patients with E. anophelis infection was 21%. The increased prevalence and mortality rates among patients with E. anophelis infection emphasize that timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment can help clinicians reduce mortality in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.