Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40494309›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2025

Patterns and mechanisms of fungal genome plasticity.

Thomas J C Sauters, Antonis Rokas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Origin and Early Evolution of Fungi: Challenges, Inferences, and Principles.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Variability and Aggressiveness ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Telomeric assemblies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas J C SautersDepartment of Biological Sciences and Evolutionary Studies Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Antonis RokasDepartment of Biological Sciences and Evolutionary Studies Initiative, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Deciphering the phenotypic and genomic traits that underlie the evolution of pathogenicity differences among Aspergillus fumigatus and its close relativesR01AI153356 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Antonis Rokas · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungal kingdom is a diverse eukaryotic clade largely composed of microbial organisms. Comprised of indispensable plant symbionts, major environmental decomposers, and important plant and animal pathogens, fungi directly shape the biological world. Advancements in genomics have increased our understanding of fungal genomic variation, the mechanisms that generate it, and the association of genomic plasticity with fungal ecological lifestyles and adaptation. In this review, we discuss the patterns and mechanisms underlying fungal genomic plasticity, juxtaposing them, where known, with patterns and mechanisms observed in plants and animals. We begin by describing the plasticity of fungal genomes, which ranges from large-scale variation in size and ploidy to the physical or temporal compartmentalization of evolutionary rates. We summarize notable patterns of genomic plasticity that have evolved independently across the fungal kingdom, including but not limited to accessory chromosomes, two-speed genomes, and hypermutation; some of these patterns are unique to fungi and largely absent from animals or plants. Strikingly, certain patterns are associated with specific ecological lifestyles, raising the hypothesis that the plasticity of fungal genomes facilitates these lifestyles. We then describe the wide variety of mechanisms that contribute to fungal genome plasticity, including sexual reproduction, transposable-element mobilization, and aneuploidy. Some mechanisms appear to be lineage-specific (for example, Starship transposable elements and repeat-induced point mutations), whereas others are more broadly distributed (parasexual and sexual reproduction). We conclude by discussing how a more balanced sampling of fungal genomes, including population genomic data, will lead to greater insights into fungal genome plasticity and its origins.

Indexed as

FungiGenome, FungalBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenetic Variation

Identifiers

PMID40494309
PMCPMC12161452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.