ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Prospective study of a rotating gantry with scanning beams of carbon-ion radiotherapy for choroidal malignant melanoma.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the safety of a rotating gantry with scanning beams of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for choroidal malignant melanoma. A prospective study of C-ion RT using a rotating gantry with scanning beams for choroidal malignant melanoma was initiated at the National Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital in March 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) clinically diagnosed ocular/choroidal malignant melanoma; (ii) tumor measurable by imaging tests; (iii) score of 0-2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale and (iv) ability to provide consent for treatment. All patients received 68 Gy in four fractions of C-ion RT by a rotating gantry with scanning beams. Between April 2018 and July 2019, 21 patients were enrolled and underwent C-ion RT as planned. All 21 patients completed the treatment schedule and the 3-year follow-up period. The median duration of follow-up was 43 months (range, 35.2-54.6 months). Regarding late normal tissue responses, three of the 21 patients developed grade 2 neovascular glaucoma; however, no other late grade ≥2 acute toxicities were observed. During the 3-year study period, all 21 patients survived with no local recurrence; none of the patients underwent enucleation. Three cases showed liver metastasis. The 3-year local control, overall survival and eye-retention rates were all 100%. The results of this prospective study confirmed that the effectiveness and safety of this method are equivalent to those of conventional passive irradiation methods, although the number of cases was small. The results of this prospective study confirmed that the effectiveness and safety of this method are equivalent to those of conventional passive irradiation methods, although the number of cases was small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.