ReviewBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2025
Nocardiosis: A case series and literature review
Review in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nocardiosis is caused by a branched Gram-positive bacillus that affects mostly immunosuppressed patients. The clinical manifestations can be localized or disseminated, and the treatment depends on the affected organs, the severity of the disease, and the susceptibility profile. Nocardiosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of localized or disseminated abscesses in immunosuppressed patients. Early clinical suspicion would allow the start of empirical treatment, prompt microbiological research, and may positively impact survival. We present a case series of 14 patients with infection by Nocardia spp. who attended different health institutions in Bogotá between January 2008 and November 2023. The clinical microbiology laboratory provided information on demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Fourteen patients were analyzed, with an average age of 49.8 years (30 to 72 years); 10 were men, and nine had a diagnosis involving immunosuppression: six had cancer and three had other underlying immunosuppression. Diabetes and hypertension were the most common comorbidities. The infection was chronic in 10 patients; the organs involved were the brain and lungs in 7 cases. Nocardia species’ was identified in five subjects; one of the patients presented infection with Cryptococcus spp. Nocardiosis treatment was prolonged and included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in 12 cases; four patients died. Infection by Nocardia spp. is primarily opportunistic, presents unique clinical and microbiological aspects, and is a differential diagnosis of localized or systemic abscesses in immunosuppressed patients. Clinical suspicion allows a careful approach in terms of diagnosis, and initiation of empiric antibiotic treatment can positively impact survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.