ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Use of natural language processing to identify patients with inflammatory breast cancer across a health-care system.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification and referral of inflammatory breast cancer remains challenging within large health-care systems, limiting access to specialized care. We developed and evaluated an artificial intelligence-driven platform integrating natural language processing (NLP) with electronic health records to systematically identify potential inflammatory breast cancer patients across 5 campuses. Our platform analyzed 8 623 494 clinical notes, implementing a sequential review process: NLP screening followed by human validation and multidisciplinary confirmation. Initial NLP screening achieved 55.4% positive predictive value, improving to 78.4% with human-in-the-loop review. Notably, among 255 confirmed patients with inflammatory breast cancer, our system demonstrated 92.2% sensitivity, identifying 57 patients (22.4%) that traditional surveillance methods missed. Documentation patterns influenced system performance, with combined inflammatory breast cancer and T4d staging mentions showing the highest predictive value (98.2%). This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that lightweight NLP systems with targeted human review can identify rare cancer cases that may otherwise remain siloed within complex health-care networks, ultimately improving access to specialized care resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.